Question: Has Anyone Become Fluent From Duolingo?

How long does it take to become fluent using duolingo?

For most people a DuoLingo tree may take +-1 year – and you won’t be fluent after this.

But then you will NOT have finished the reverse trees: Write in the L2 target language – so you can almost only read, not speak/write..

Is duolingo really that bad?

The scope of duolingo is very limited. I think it’s well established that most courses get you to somewhere around A2, B1 at best, which is just enough to be a bit challenging, but not enough to make you able to expand your knowledge on your own.

Can you become fluent in French with duolingo?

Duolingo won’t get you anywhere near fluent. If you’re learning French (or any other language on Duolingo, for that matter) to be able to read, then you’re in the right place. If you want to become conversational, reach a level higher than A2, then you must complement your learning with other sources.

How long does it take to finish French duolingo?

There is about 78 skills and 358 lessons in the French course (excluding the optional skills and lessons). If each lesson takes 15 minutes, it will take you 5370 minutes (89.5 hours). If you do 2 lessons each day it will take you 179 days.

Why is duolingo so bad?

Essentially, Duolingo is a computerized version of a simple foreign language workbook that did not teach you any Spanish or another foreign language in high school. … Learning with Duolingo is slow and inefficient. But as with many other not-very-good methods, you can learn something if you put enough time into it.

Is it worth paying for duolingo?

Paying monthly is more profitable for them most definitely. I always thought it was mostly just about supporting Duo and getting a few (useless) extra perks as a thank you… It’s not worth it if you’re just looking for bonus features, imo. Yeah, I think a big part is the supporting duolingo.

How fluent will duolingo make you?

Duolingo will not make you fluent or a great speaking in your chosen language. It does not claim to do so either. Instead, Duolingo will teach the basics of a language, providing you with around 1500 words (about the same as a 6 year old) and acts as a great basis for further learning.

Has anyone ever learned a language from duolingo?

You can’t fully learn a language on Duolingo. It’s great for testing out a language, and learning the very basics, but it’s not comprehensive, and a lot of things are wrong or oversimplified. Duolingo is more like a supplement to already doing serious self-study or taking a formal course.

Is duolingo as good as Rosetta Stone?

Personally, I prefer Duolingo for its ease of use, quick lessons and extra learning tools, but Rosetta Stone is good for diving head-first into a language and challenging yourself by only working in that new language. Try them both for free to see which better matches your learning style.

Is Babbel better than duolingo?

Winner: Duolingo Because Duolingo is a free resource, it has a huge userbase. It’s reported that the app has over 300,000,000 active users. Babbel is far behind in this, due to it’s monetisation model.

Is duolingo a waste of time?

It’s a waste of time. In fact, it’s just as bad as the education system Von Ahn criticizes. Duolingo outsources its translation services, allowing for awkward sentences to slip in undetected. … Many people think Duolingo works because it uses gamification to make language learning “fun”.

Will duolingo make you conversational?

In general, Duolingo is not designed to teach conversational foreign language. However, from prior forum discussions. … So, please correct me if need be because I’m going from my memory), people say that Duolingo gives you a lot of confidence in using a foreign language in a practical situation.